Was John D Rockefeller A Robber Baron — страница 6

  • Просмотров 359
  • Скачиваний 5
  • Размер файла 23
    Кб

in his fifth year of presidency, he was looked upon by the public and the political realm, to resign, because it would be for his own country’s good. This was right after the Watergate scandal had blown up in the Republicans face. The scandal of Watergate was members of Nixon’s cabinet and associates were to spy on the Democratic Party in their headquarters. There were several tapes and other scandalous information, which led to the eventual leakage of the whole thing. The public now viewed Nixon as a shoddy type and not worthy of the presidency (Osborne 187). CRITIQUE SECTION I disagreed with Joan Hoff-Wilson because I do not believe President Nixon did anything to promote a positive example in running the government. He lacked charisma and honesty (Taking Sides 369), which

is vital when you are leading a country. If you cannot trust the President of the United States, whom can you trust? I agreed with Stanley I. Kutler because Nixon was overly consumed by public relations. He was so caught up with trying to spin stories around so he would look good, protecting his image and denying any truths that would tarnish that image (Taking Sides 370). Nixon behaved in the same manner all five years he was President, feeling no remorse for his deceiving acts. I agreed with Jonathan Vankin because Nixon’s involvement in the mob was not commendable by any means. His schemes that he put together with teamsters did not show any class of a true President. The pardon of Nixon, after he resigned, was a sign of just how sorry of a President he really was. The

feeling of discontent would haunt him for the rest of his life. The public’s strong and harsh criticisms would remain until the day he died. I agreed with Jacobs and Shapiro because manipulation was one of the many corrupt attributes of Richard Nixon, and to be forgiven with so many of them is highly doubtful by the majority of the public. Manipulative leadership appeals to momentary popular emotions and is motivated by the drive to augment personal power. Nixon’s relations with the pollsters illustrate the model of manipulative leadership the authors described. I agreed with the textbook because Nixon’s lack of effort towards ending the Vietnam War showed how much he cared for himself and not the country. All the American casualties of the War and the demonstrations on the

home front magnified his failure. Also the disguised surrender was not covert enough to where the people did not know what was going on. The morale of the country after that was not good. I agreed with John Osborne because the resignation of Richard Nixon was inevitable or he would have been impeached. Nixon resigned because he had no more secrets to hide. All the scandalous events that had taken place during his presidency were exposed. The press had a field day with Nixon after the resignation and up to the day he died. In conclusion, I disagreed that Richard Nixon should be forgiven by American history for his ruthless reign in the Oval Office. His corrupt and scheming ways are the ways of the devil. I think he showed no leadership for a country, which was in the midst of many

controversies. President Nixon only added to those controversies and made them more complicated. I think Nixon should go down in history as the worst President to ever hold office at the White House. He had set an awful example of the Republican Party and it would not recover from his disgraces for quite some time. I think for the crimes that Nixon committed, he should have gone to prison for because he did not commit crimes against one person, he committed crimes against one country. Allen, Gary. The Rockefeller File. Seal Beach, CA: 76 Press, 1991 Best, Gary Dean. “Pride Prejudice and Politics: Roosevelt Versus Recovery” Taking Sides Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in American History. eds. Larry Madaras et al. Guilford CT: Dushkin/ McGraw-Hill, 1997. Biles, Roger.

“A New Deal for the American People”. Taking Sides Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in American History. eds. Larry Madaras et al. Guilford CT: Dushkin/ McGraw-Hill, 1997. Chiatkin, Anton. Treason in America. Washington DC: Executive Intelligence Review, 1989. Divine, Breen, Frederickson and Williams. America Past and Present. Fifth Edition Vol 2, New York: Longman, 1999. Hidey, Ralph W. and Muriel E. “History of Standard Oil Company (New Jersey),Vol 1: Pioneering in Big Business” ” Taking Sides Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in American History. eds. Larry Madaras et al. Guilford CT: Dushkin/ McGraw-Hill, 1997. Hoff-Wilson, Joan. “Richard M. Nixon: The CorporatePresidency” Taking Sides Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in American History. eds.