The Morality Of Creating Life Essay Research — страница 3

  • Просмотров 283
  • Скачиваний 5
  • Размер файла 17

that God is able to use His infinite wisdom, whereas mortals are not capable of doing this. Another argument that he presents is that while the DNA material may be the same, just as with identical twins, that the personality would be different. While this is not proven, it is quite likely. The environment of one’s community determines the personality much more so than one’s genetic code. Wesche writes, “A human clone would be as much a human being as its donor, its personality would be distinct even if its essence and genetic make-up were identical to the donor’s and therefore it would be possessed of all the value inherent in any personality” (276). Weiche again failed to realize that both twins are made by God’s infinite wisdom, not by human wisdom. Where the cloned

being may be unique, it is still manmade, and prone to error by its creator. The idea of creating life by controversial means is not a new idea. In vitro fertilization was a major concern to many people fifteen years ago. Dr. Kenneth D. Pimple, author of The Ethics of Human Cloning and the Fate of Science in a Democratic Society, views the two methods for creating life as quite similar. Dr. Pimple views that an objection that holds true to both of these methods is that they both use artificial methods in a laboratory to create life. He notes, however, that, “A key difference between these two methods is that cloning an embryo through blastomere separation is as chancy as normal sexual reproduction, whereas with somatic cloning, you can have a better idea of what you are going

to get-?” (1). This may be the exact problem with cloning. When an individual is able to create exactly what they want, expectations are unreasonably high. Catharine Cookson, Ph.D. in religious studies from the University of Virginia and author of Legal Perspectives on Cloning: Of Monsters Unleashed: A Modest Beginning to a Casuistry of Cloning, feels that there needs to be a happy medium insofar as cloning technology. She writes that the first step is “Providing a system of enforced responsibility that looks to long term effects and social goods” (9). While she is against cloning, she is in favor of scientists being free to advance technology that is less controversial under standards and limits. She raises the issue that with all of the hardships which normal humans are

forced to overcome daily, a clone would have the power to overcome the obstacles that it is faced with. The issue of cloning is no longer an issue in the imagination; it has come to life. Just as Victor created the Monster, society may be close to stumbling into the same fate. Scientists are now able to clone sheep and monkeys; humans cannot be far away. The government, along with the President of the United States, sees enough danger in cloning to place limitations on it. While the publicity on this topic may fade, its dangers will not. Actions need to be taken before a monster is created. Cookston, Catharine. “Legal Perspectives on Cloning: of Monsters Unleashed: A Modest Beginning to a Casuistry of Cloning.” Academic Universe. 1998: 10. Lexis- Nexis. (3/28/99). Kilner, John F. “Stop Cloning Around.” Christian Today. 28 April 1997: 10-11. Krajnak, Kevin. “Cardinal Urges Congress to Ban Human Cloning.” n. pag. Online. Internet. (4/5/99). McLane, Maureen N. “Literate Species: Populations, ‘Humanities,’ and Frankenstein.” ELH Winter 1996: 959-968. Meilaender, Gilbert. “Religious, Philosophical, and Ethical perspectives on Cloning: Cloning in Protestant Perspective.” Academic Universe. 1998: 10. Lexis- Nexis. (3/28/99). Pimple, Kenneth D. “Religious, Philosophical, and Ethical perspectives on Cloning: The Ethics of Human Cloning and The Fate of Science in a Democratic Society.” Academic

Universe. 1998: 10. Lexis- Nexis. (3/28/99). RNS. “Clinton Urges Ban on Cloning of Himans.” Christian Century. 18 June 1997: 583-584. Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. New York: Norton and Company, 1996. Wesche, Kenneth Paul. “Well Hello, Dolly.” Pro Ecclesia Summer 1997: 273-276.