The cybernetics movements — страница 5

  • Просмотров 3332
  • Скачиваний 81
  • Размер файла 62
    Кб

were held under the label of cybernetics, but the educational programs that were established did not survive in discipline-oriented universities. When their founders retired, the programs were closed. One consequence of the lack of educational programs at universities is that key ideas tend to be reinvented. One example is the work on complex adaptive systems centered at the Santa Fe Institute. These writers rarely refer to the early work in cybernetics and systems theory. What prevented unity? There was never agreement on fundamentals. Eric Dent in his doctoral dissertation at The George Washington University provides an explanation of the continuing heterogeneity of the field of cybernetics and systems science. (Dent, 1996) Dent claims that after World War II the systems

sciences dramatically expanded the scientific enterprise. Specifically, they expanded science along eight dimensions -- causality, determinism, relationships, holism, environment, self-organization, reflexivity, and observation. (Dent, 2001) However, not all of the various systems fields chose to emphasize the same dimensions. Indeed, each field chose a unique combination. This meant that the various systems fields did not agree on what the key issues were. As a result each subfield developed its own language, theories, methods, traditions, and results. These eight dimensions have both united and divided the systems sciences. The dimensions unite the systems sciences because each of the subfields of systems science uses at least one of the new assumptions, whereas classical

science uses none. The dimensions divide the systems sciences because each subfield emphasizes a different dimension or set of dimensions. Hence, issues that are very important in one subfield are less important or do not arise in other subfields. Given different questions, the answers in theories and methods have been different. (Umpleby and Dent, 1999) Perhaps in the 21st century the progress made in developing the field of cybernetics in many disciplines will be successfully integrated. REFERENCES Bausch, K. (ed.). (2004), Special Issue on Agoras of the Global Village, World Futures. Vol. 6, No. 1-2. Chase, A. (2003), Harvard and the Unabomber: The Education of an American Terrorist. New York: W.W. Norton. Conway, F. and J. Siegelman. (2005), Dark Hero of the Information Age:

In Search of Norbert Wiener, the Father of Cybernetics. New York: Basic Books. Dechert, C. (ed.). (1966), The Social Impact of Cybernetics. New York: A Clarion Book. Dent, E. (1996), The Design, Development, and Evaluation of Measures to Survey Worldview in Organizations. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms. Dent, E. (2001), “System Science Traditions: Differing Philosophical Assumptions.” Systems, Journal of the Polish Systems Society, Vol. 6, No. 1-2. Lefebvre, V. (1982), Algebra of Conscience: A Comparative Analysis of Western and Soviet Ethical Systems. London: Reidel Publishing Co. Luhman, N. (1995), Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Marks, J. (1978), The Search for the Manchurian Candidate. New York: Times Books. McCulloch, W. and W. Pitts.

(1943), “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity.” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, pp. 115-133. Reprinted in W. McCulloch, Embodiments of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965, pp. 19-39. Mead, M. (1968), “Cybernetics of Cybernetics.” In von Foerster, et al. (eds.), Purposive Systems, Spartan Books. Pias, C. (ed.). (2004), Cybernetics – Kybernetik: The Macy Conferences 1946-1953. Zurich-Berlin: Diaphanes. Powers, W. (1973), Behavior: the Control of Perception. New York: Aldine Publishing. Rosenblueth, A., N. Wiener, and J. Bigelow. (1943), “Behavior, Purpose and Teleology.” Philosophy of Science, 10, pp. 18-24. Reprinted in W. Buckley (ed.) Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. Chicago: Aldine, 1968, pp. 221-225. Shannon,

C. and W. Weaver. (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Umpleby, S. (1974), “On Making a Scientific Revolution.” H. von Foerster (ed.), Cybernetics of Cybernetics. Reprinted in 1995, Minneapolis: Future Systems. Umpleby, S. (1979), "Computer Conference on General Systems Theory: One Year's Experience." In Henderson, M. and M. MacNaughton. (eds.), Electronic Communication: Technology and Impacts. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Umpleby, S. (1981), "The 1980 Planning Conference of the American Society for Cybernetics." Cybernetics Forum, Vol. 10, No.1. Umpleby, S. and K. Thomas. (1983),"Applying Systems Theory to the Conduct of Systems Research." In Anthony Debons (ed.), Information Science in