Advancing Aggression Essay Research Paper When referring

  • Просмотров 227
  • Скачиваний 12
  • Размер файла 16
    Кб

Advancing Aggression Essay, Research Paper When referring to the Bosnia-Herzegovina Civil War it is necessary to look at past history of the nation before being able to make an accurate and reliable hypothesis on the decision making that was made during the crisis. The aspect, which will be argued, will be that the principals actions were unjust when referring to the religious injustices that occurred. During the past century there have been many altercations between Serbs, Croats, and Muslims. Earlier in this century it all began with the German and Italian invasion and occupation of Yugoslavia. Around mid 1941 Nazi Germany established Croatia as an independent state. The Nazis also installed a neo-nazi puppet Government of the Independent State of Croatia ( An Analysis ).

Western powers should have never let this happen, but they hadn t an idea of what to do about it, and they did not want to strain relations with a vital partner in the European Community and NATO so they meekly followed . ( An Analysis ) In the years after the creation of the independent state of Croatia ending at 1945, the Croats systematically murdered over one million Serb men, women, and children ( What Happened ). Records show that the Muslims were also as brutal as the Croats with their merciless killings. Both wore the Utasha symbol upon their uniforms. The religious injustices began between the Croats, Serbs, and Muslims with the killing of over one millions Serbs by the Utasha (equivalent to the Nazis). These killings were considered genocide with the mass killings of

certain races because of discriminatory reasons. As the end of the war approached, bands of Serbs went out after revenge against the Croat and Muslim soldiers and civilians. The casualties [the Serbs] inflicted were less than 100th of what they suffered . ( An Analysis ) This history shows where the tension comes from today and how this triggered the conflict that resulted in the area of Bosnia-Herzegovina. It is also easier to understand why the Serbs in both Bosnia and Serbia refused to subject themselves to a Croat and Muslim majority. Plus, tension was mounting before the full fledge war began in 1991 due to the fact that Serbs dominated Yugoslavia. The substance of this conflict is all ethnic. The Serbs dominated Yugoslavia and this alarmed the Muslims and the Croats.

Remember, the Muslims and Croats performed ethnic cleansing against the Serbs during World War II. Yugoslavia was run between six different nationalities Serbs, Croats, Slovenes, Montenegrins, Macedonians, and Muslims. Each different nationality had regions of their own within Yugoslavia. The Serbs, however, were spread all throughout Yugoslavia. Each state had their own government and Yugoslavia had one large government that was called the central government, which was ran by all nationalities. The role of president for the central government would rotate between each group. (Tanner) The Serbs had considerable power within Yugoslavia at the time Croatia decided to declare independence from the central government in 1990. Serbia, knowing that Serbs were living in Croatia and also

knowing that Croatia possessed much land and resources, refused to let them break apart. Serbia was determined to bring back together the whole state of Yugoslavia that they knew they would dominate (Smith). As one Franciscan priest puts it, Serbia was determined to handle plans for a breakup like a bully husband in a bad marriage. If you re going to walk out on me, lady, you re going to do it on broken legs, and with crutches, if you even get out (Smith). This was a mistake made by the Serbs. They were just out to get revenge for what had happened to them during World War II. Not only did they try and keep a hold of Croatia, but also they argued that they did not hold enough influence within Yugoslavia and that Serbs outside of Serbia were encountering systematic discrimination,