Abortion The Hard Truth Essay Research Paper

Abortion: The Hard Truth Essay, Research Paper ABORTION THE HARD TRUTH Christopher Lora Mr. Luera Period 5 Table of Contents Outline …………………………………………………………………………………………….1 Body……………………………………………………………………………………………….2 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………………8 Title: Abortion: the hard truth Hypothesis: It is evident that abortion is harmful to the mother. I. Introduction  The definition of abortion is presented.  How abortion is argued is told.  In what way it should be see is stated.  The hypothesis is present.  The reason follows the hypothesis. II.

Civic Views  Abortion is a see differently.  The Catholic Church opposes abortion.  Other religions back up Catholics.  Opinions of individuals are different from the majorities. III. Medical Views  Abortion is dangerous.  Many precautions must be followed.  Many physical imparities are likely to occur.  Death by human hands is caused by a psychological reaction after the abortion.  More deaths are likely after abortion than they are after childbirth. Conclusion: Whether you are a religious or fighter for women’s rights, one this is most certain from both sides based on the research held on a medical foundation, at least one death will always result from every abortion performed. The Oxford Dictionary defines abortion as the expulsion of a fetus,

naturally or especially by medical induction, from the womb before it is able to survive independently, especially in the first 28 weeks of a human pregnancy. Today many argue whether abortion should be legal in the United States. Some show religious views while others show civic views. The basis of such a debate should be on medical information. It is evident that abortion is harmful to the mother. Although women feel relief after the operation, they do not perceive at least the physical consequences. The outcome of most abortions is graphic and painful. For many Americans, abortion involves a blend of social, moral, and legal issues so that one person may hold several conflicting views (Siegel 55). Although the word “abortion” is describe in a concise manner, when the issue

is introduced to the rules of medical ethics, it is as vague as the seven wonders of the world. Some say that the abortion is a form of murder and others believe that it is just as valid as breast implants. These are all views shared by people within the same community, if not biosphere. It has become so controversial and divergent, that even the Church has a strong say on the topic. Abortion has been questioned as legit as far back as the1960’s with words from the leader of the Catholic Church. The vast congregation presently declares it true the subject was hardly stressed in the early Christian Church, as a sin (Siegel 3). However Siegel has also quoted Vatican II, the largest Church gathering in Christian history, of declaring abortion a “supreme dishonor to the

Creator.” He also quoted the text to say the following: “from the moment of its conception life must be guarded with the greatest care, while abortion and infanticide are unspeakable crimes.” Its breakaway congregations, despite their obvious differences support the Catholic Church. The decision of any congregation, sect, or group is still different from the individual member. A survey done between 1972 and 1982 proved that not only did people realize that abortion is a controversial issue, but they also have their own opinions. The National Opinion Research Center has also asked those it may concern their reason for either supporting or opposing abortions (Siegel 55-56). Those in favor considered circumstances of rape, unwanted pregnancies, freedom of choice, health